Photo Credits: Denise and Katharine.
The baton, passed from Caroline to Orla last year, has now passed to Denise who is the 2016 Chair for Cook&Eat. The inaugural session was held in
October.
Denise and Peggy
Denise's program will focus on cooking vegetarian food. Today we cooked a spicy carrot salad (watch out for those piments verts on your fingers and eyes); a vegetable tagine with steamed "slow" couscous (the couscous takes longer than the instant couscous cooking method, but is infinitely better); and baklava for dessert. Denise found the elegant flamingo napkins in Versailles, and these graced the table.
Spicy carrot salad
The tagine cooking....
..... and the finished dish
Baklava using phyllo dough & walnuts, and at least six hands
Elizabeth and Katharine
Leslie on duty with the couscous
Mary-Catherine, Susan and Elizabeth
Peggy and Leslie
Susan, Denise, Anne and Elizabeth
Orla, Peggy and Mary-Catherine
Katharine, Anne, Orla, Peggy and Leslie
A happy morning for us all, and we thank Denise for her warm welcome and hospitality,
and a great kick-off to the Cook&Eat year. A warm welcome also to our new member
Elizabeth.
Editor: Michelle Obama, our American First Lady, lifts us all up.
Words to live by: When they go low, we aim high.
Four
thank-you notes to Michelle Obama, who has spent the past eight years
quietly and confidently changing the course of American history.
From the New York Times.
By Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie:
She
had rhythm, a flow and swerve, hands slicing air, body weight moving
from foot to foot, a beautiful rhythm. In anything else but a black
American body, it would have been contrived. The three-quarter sleeves
of her teal dress announced its appropriateness, as did her matching
brooch. But the cut of the dress scorned any “future first lady”
stuffiness; it hung easy on her, as effortless as her animation. And a
brooch, Old World style accessory, yes, but hers was big and ebulliently
shaped and perched center on her chest. Michelle Obama was speaking. It
was the 2008 Democratic National Convention. My anxiety rose and
swirled, watching and willing her to be as close to perfection as
possible, not for me, because I was already a believer, but for the
swaths of America that would rather she stumbled.
She
first appeared in the public consciousness, all common sense and
mordant humor, at ease in her skin. She had the air of a woman who could
balance a checkbook, and who knew a good deal when she saw it, and who
would tell off whomever needed telling off. She was tall and sure and
stylish. She was reluctant to be first lady, and did not hide her
reluctance beneath platitudes. She seemed not so much unique as true.
She sharpened her husband’s then-hazy form, made him solid, more than
just a dream. (Editor: scroll on down, keep reading, the pagination isn't working as I'd wish it to).
Chimamanda Ngozi Adich
But
she had to flatten herself to better fit the mold of first lady. At the
law firm where they met before love felled them, she had been her
husband’s mentor; they seemed to be truly friends, partners, equals in a
modern marriage in a new American century. Yet voters and observers,
wide strips of America, wanted her to conform and defer, to cleanse her
tongue of wit and barb. When she spoke of his bad morning-breath, a
quirky and humanizing detail, she was accused of emasculating him.
Because
she said what she thought, and because she smiled only when she felt
like smiling, and not constantly and vacuously, America’s cheapest
caricature was cast on her: the Angry Black Woman. Women, in general,
are not permitted anger — but from black American women, there is an
added expectation of interminable gratitude, the closer to groveling the
better, as though their citizenship is a phenomenon that they cannot
take for granted.
“I
love this country,” she said to applause. She needed to say it — her
salve to the hostility of people who claimed she was unpatriotic because
she had dared to suggest that, as an adult, she had not always been
proud of her country.
Of
course she loved her country. The story of her life as she told it was
wholesomely American, drenched in nostalgia: a father who worked shifts
and a mother who stayed home, an almost mythic account of self-reliance,
of moderation, of working-class contentment. But she is also a
descendant of slaves, those full human beings considered human fractions
by the American state. And ambivalence should be her birthright. For
me, a foreign-raised person who likes America, one of its greatest
curiosities is this: that those who have the most reason for dissent are
those least allowed dissent.
Michelle
Obama was speaking. I felt protective of her because she was speaking
to an America often too quick to read a black woman’s confidence as
arrogance, her straightforwardness as entitlement.
She
was informal, colloquial, her sentences bookended by the word “see,” a
conversational fillip that also strangely felt like a mark of
authenticity. She seemed genuine. She was genuine. All over America,
black women were still, their eyes watching a form of God, because she
represented their image writ large in the world.
Her
speech was vibrant, a success. But there was, in her eyes and beneath
her delivery and in her few small stumbles, a glimpse of something
somber. A tight, dark ball of apprehension. As though she feared eight
years of holding her breath, of living her life with a stone in her gut.
Eight
years later, her blue dress was simpler but not as eager to be
appropriate; its sheen, and her edgy hoop earrings, made clear that she
was no longer auditioning.
Her
daughters were grown. She had shielded them and celebrated them, and
they appeared in public always picture perfect, as though their careful
grooming was a kind of reproach. She had called herself mom-in-chief,
and cloaked in that nonthreatening title, had done what she cared about.
She
embraced veterans and military families, and became their listening
advocate. She threw open the White House doors to people on the margins
of America. She was working class, and she was Princeton, and so she
could speak of opportunity as a tangible thing. Her program Reach Higher
pushed high schoolers to go further, to want more. She jumped rope with
children on the White House grounds as part of her initiative to combat
childhood obesity. She grew a vegetable garden and campaigned for
healthier food in schools. She reached across borders and cast her light
on the education of girls all over the world. She danced on television
shows. She hugged more people than any first lady ever has, and she made
“first lady” mean a person warmly accessible, a person both normal and
inspirational and a person many degrees of cool.
She
had become an American style icon. Her dresses and workouts. Her
carriage and curves. Toned arms and long slender fingers. Even her
favored kitten heels, for women who cannot fathom wearing shoes in the
halfway house between flats and high heels, have earned a certain
respect because of her. No public figure better embodies that mantra of
full female selfhood: Wear what you like.
It
was the 2016 Democratic Convention. Michelle Obama was speaking. She
said “black boy” and “slaves,” words she would not have said eight years
ago because eight years ago any concrete gesturing to blackness would
have had real consequences.
She
was relaxed, emotional, sentimental. Her uncertainties laid to rest.
Her rhythm was subtler, because she no longer needed it as her armor,
because she had conquered.
The
insults, those barefaced and those adorned as jokes, the acidic
scrutiny, the manufactured scandals, the base questioning of legitimacy,
the tone of disrespect, so ubiquitous, so casual. She had faced them
and sometimes she hurt and sometimes she blinked but throughout she
remained herself.
Michelle
Obama was speaking. I realized then that she hadn’t been waiting to
exhale these past eight years. She had been letting that breath out, in
small movements, careful because she had to be, but exhaling still.
Chimamanda
Ngozi Adichie is the author of the novel “Americanah” and the
book-length essay “We Should All Be Feminists.” A recipient of a
MacArthur Foundation “genius” grant, her words have been sampled by
Beyoncé and, most recently, on clothing from Dior’s spring 2017
collection.
By Gloria Steinem:
Michelle
Obama came into my life in stages. I knew that, like her husband, she
was a Harvard-educated lawyer, but that unlike him, she had grown up on
the South Side of Chicago, with parents who had not gone to college.
When Barack Obama was a summer associate at her Chicago law firm, they
met because she was his mentor. After his successful campaign for the
U.S. Senate, I noticed that she chose not to go to Washington. Instead,
he commuted to their home and two daughters in Chicago where Michelle
had a big job as head of community affairs for a hospital.
Gloria Steinem, Credit Carly Romeo
But
she really entered my imagination once she became first lady, a tall,
strong, elegant and seriously smart woman who happened to live in the
White House. She managed to convey dignity and humor at the same time,
to be a mother of two daughters and insist on regular family dinners,
and to take on health issues and a national food industry addicted to
unhealthy profits. She did this despite an undertow of bias in this
country that subtly questioned everything she did. Was she too strong,
physically and intellectually, to be a proper first lady?
After
a decade under a public microscope, she has managed what no other first
lady — and few people in any public position — have succeeded in doing:
She has lived a public life without sacrificing her privacy and
authenticity. She made her husband both more human and effective as a
president by being his interpreter and defender, but also someone we
knew was capable of being his critic. Eventually, she spoke up about the
pain of the racist assumptions directed at her, but she waited until
her husband could no longer be politically punished for her honesty. And
she has always been the best kind of mother, which means insisting that
fathers be equal parents. All of this she has done with honesty, humor
and, most important, kindness.
Recently,
over the course of the Trump-Clinton presidential campaign, Michelle
has become one of the most effective public speakers of our time. That’s
serious. To be less serious, she has always been a woman who knows the
difference between fashion (what outside forces tell you to wear) and
style (the way you express a unique self). At one lunch in the White
House for women who had been spokespeople and supporters in President
Obama’s second campaign, she invited local public school children to
sing and perform. Those students, mostly African-American kids, were
spirited, talented and at ease in a White House that belongs to them as
much as to anyone in this country, yet they wouldn’t have been there
without Michelle.
What
will she choose to do next? That’s up to her. She could do anything,
from becoming a U.S. senator from Illinois to campaigning for the safety
and education of girls globally. She could also choose to lead a
private life. Whatever she decides, I trust her judgment.
Though
I’m old enough to remember Eleanor and Franklin D. Roosevelt in the
White House — and all the couples and families since — I have never seen
such balance and equal parenting, such love, respect, mutuality and
pleasure in each other’s company. We will never have a democracy until
we have democratic families and a society without the invented
categories of both race and gender. Michelle Obama may have changed
history in the most powerful way — by example.
Gloria
Steinem, a feminist activist and writer, has been touring America,
campaigning for Hillary Clinton and promoting the paperback edition of
her travelogue “My Life on the Road.”
By Jon Meacham:
On
a lovely early autumn day in her final October in the White House,
Michelle Obama stepped out onto a sunny South Lawn and, in a way, bid
farewell. The setting was her celebrated organic kitchen garden, but the
subtext seemed to go far beyond any single initiative. “I have to tell
you that being here with all of you, overlooking this beautiful garden —
and it is beautiful — it’s kind of an emotional moment,” Mrs. Obama
said at a ceremony to unveil a bigger, fortified version of the garden.
“We’re having a lot of these emotional moments because everything is the
last. But this is particularly my baby, because this garden is where it
all started. So we’re really coming full circle back to the very
beginning.” She recalled conversations in 2008 about the role she might
play in an Obama presidency — and noted, tellingly, that the garden
emerged after “Barack actually won,” to which she added: “He won twice.”
The gathered guests happily applauded.
Jon Meacham, Credit Gasper Tringale
There,
in a way, was the essential Michelle Obama, or at least the essential
observable version of herself: speaking of broad public good (the
garden, which was part of her campaign against childhood obesity) while
revealing an arch sense of competitiveness. My husband won; he won
twice. As their history-making time in the White House comes to an end,
it’s worth pondering the lessons of the Age of Obama. My own view is
that both the president and the first lady have conducted themselves
splendidly in the White House, managing the most difficult of tasks with
apparent ease: projecting a grace that masked the ambition and the
drive that took them, at early ages, to the pinnacle of American life.
In
this they have kept faith with a tradition that, in our country, is as
old as George Washington, who embodied the classical ideal of
Cincinnatus, the reluctant leader summoned from his plow to lead the
nation. President Obama gets much of the public credit for handling his
eight years coolly, but the first lady has been a critical element of
his success. She has chosen her shots carefully — not least in choosing
to make the case against Donald Trump on the campaign trail in 2016 —
and is leaving the country with a warm impression of an excellent
mother, a steady spouse and a sensible, devoted American.
Not
everyone agrees, of course; not everyone ever does. The Obama skeptics
and the Obama haters have from time to time questioned her patriotism,
but this is the same country that managed, in some quarters, to hold
Eleanor Roosevelt in contempt. The important thing is that Mrs. Obama, a
clear-eyed lawyer, found a way to withstand the scrutiny of the
spotlight. In point of fact, she did more than withstand it. To borrow a
phrase from William Faulkner, she not only endured it; she prevailed
over it.
How?
By finding, or appearing to find, that most elusive of things in the
modern world: balance. She was not Mrs. Roosevelt or Mrs. Carter or Mrs.
Reagan or Mrs. Clinton, playing roles in affairs of state. Instead she
did what the first African-American first lady arguably had to do to
play a successful public role. In Voltaire’s terms, she cultivated her
own garden, never threatening and never intimidating her neighbors. Much
more doubtless unfolded beneath the surface or behind closed doors;
history will sort that out. For now, it is enough to say that she is
leaving the White House a strong and popular figure with a lifetime of
good will and great reservoirs of capital on which to draw as she and
her husband write their next chapters.
Back
in 2008, musing on the life she was about to enter, Mrs. Obama recalled
doubts about her garden — a bit of projection, one suspects, for doubts
about the entire presidential enterprise. “What if we planted this
garden and nothing grew?” Mrs. Obama asked. “We didn’t know about the
soil, or the sunlight. And it’s like, oh, my God, what if nothing grows?
… It was like afterwards I remember telling Sam [Kass, the former White
House senior advisor for nutrition], ‘This better work, buddy. This
better work.’” And so it did.
Jon
Meacham, a Pulitzer Prize-winning biographer, is the author, most
recently, of “Destiny and Power: The American Odyssey of George Herbert
Walker Bush.”
By Rashida Jones:
The
first time I met Michelle Obama was at the White House as part of a
mentoring initiative, for which the first lady had brought together a
dynamic group of women to speak to urban teenage girls about their
career goals. Olympians, actresses, producers, writers, an astronaut and
an Air Force general gathered in the West Wing to greet Michelle before
we headed out to various local schools. She was warm, gracious and
charming. She thanked us for coming, hugged everybody and made us all
feel like her friends. As first lady, she has ticked all the boxes:
loving wife, protective mother, health and fitness advocate, garden
enthusiast and, yes, style icon. These accomplishments have left
traditionalists feeling satisfied.
Rashida Jones, Credit Noam Galai/Getty Images
But,
as is always the way, her reputation as the perfect hostess invited
criticism from progressives. Enter Michelle Obama, outspoken activist, a
woman who isn’t afraid to remind us she is a proud African-American
woman, which is, in itself, revolutionary. A former lawyer who speaks
out on behalf of gay rights and gun control, she delivered an
unforgettable speech at the Democratic National Convention earlier this
year, shining a clear, bright light on our country’s shameful history.
Suddenly, the progressives were pleased and the traditionalists were
confused. The media wants to pin her down — they’ve been trying since
Barack Obama took office in 2009. But you simply can’t.
Michelle
Obama embodies the modern, American woman, and I don’t mean that in any
platitudinous or vague way. Rarely can someone express their many
identities at the same time while seeming authentic. My female friends
and I often talk about feeling like we’re “too much.” We’re complicated;
we want to be so many things. I want to be a boss and also be
vulnerable. I want to be outspoken and respected, but also sexy and
beautiful.
All
women struggle to reconcile the different people that we are at all
times, to merge our conflicting desires, to represent ourselves honestly
and feel good about the inherent contradictions. But Michelle manages
to do this with poise, regardless of the scrutiny. That, to me, is the
best thing for feminism. Her individual choices force us to accept that
being a woman isn’t just one thing. Or two things. Or three things. The
position of first lady is, unfortunately, symbolic, and that makes it
fair game for media analysis ad nauseam. But no think piece can fully
encompass a real woman.
If
feminism’s goal is equal opportunity and choice, Michelle makes me feel
like every choice is available. You can go to Princeton and Harvard,
you can rap with Missy Elliott, you can be a mother and a lawyer and a
powerful orator. You can champion the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act,
while also caring about fashion. You can dance with Ellen and also
fearlessly remind people, on live television, of the reality of your
position: “I wake up every morning in a house that was built by slaves.
And I watch my daughters, two beautiful, intelligent, black young women,
playing with their dogs on the White House lawn.” You can be your
husband’s partner and supporter, and also use your cultural and
political capital to campaign for Hillary Clinton, unflinchingly
standing up to her “locker room talk”-ing bully of an opponent with the
battle cry “enough is enough!” — eloquently putting into words what a
lot of people, myself included, had been feeling.
Michelle
Obama will have her own legacy, separate from her husband’s. And it
will be that she was the first first lady to show women that they don’t
have to choose. That it’s okay to be everything.
Guidance for individuals applying for a US Social Security Number from overseas.
The
Social Security Administration must insure that the Social Security
Numbers issued are not issued to individuals looking to use them for
fraudulent purposes. This is why the Social Security Administration
requires that individuals applying for Social Security Numbers for the
first time do so in person and present specific documents attesting to
their identity and, for many born outside the United States, proof of
their lifetime residency outside the United States.
The following is guidance to help those who are managing the process.
First you must decide, based on where you live, how the application process will be managed. There are two basic options:
1. Make an appointment to visit the Federal Benefits Unit (FBU) office. Contact the office of the FBU at the closest US Embassy or Consulate in your country of residence. It
is essential that you contact FBU for an appointment as they will not
accept walk-ins, and they will be able to tell you in advance the exact
documentation you need to provide to process the application. For a complete list of FBU offices see: https://www.ssa.gov/foreign/foreign.htm.
This is the best option for expediency, as the information given to the
FBU is automatically inputted into the Social Security Administration.
2. Make an appointment to visit to the Embassy/Consulate without a FBU office.
If you are unable to make an appointment at a US Embassy or Consulate
with a FBU office, you can still make an appointment to visit your local
US Embassy or Consulate to submit an application for your Social
Security Number. Be sure to call or write in advance to make an
appointment so that the Embassy/Consulate can tell you in advance what
documentation you should bring with you. This documentation varies from
country to country.
When visiting a Consulate or Embassy without an FBU, you will not
be speaking directly with a representative of the FBU, but with
Embassy/Consulate staff who will review your application/documentation
and then pass your dossier onto the Social Security Administration.
This extra step may result in a delay if the dossier is not complete or
the documentation provided is not acceptable to Social Security. In
this case, the dossier will be returned to the Embassy/Consulate for
correction, i.e. you would be contacted to provide more information or
told that the documents you provided were not sufficient.
Helpful steps to track your application:
Like many government services, the application for a Social Security
number takes some time to process. Social Security does its best to
expedite the process and understands that many applying from overseas
are in immediate need of a number.
Applications made directly to an office of the FBU have the greatest
chance of being treated in an expedited manner as they are screened by
the appropriate staff at submission and go directly into the Social
Security Administration process for application. The individuals at FBU
can determine on sight if the applicant has the appropriate documents
needed for the application. It would be rare in this instance that the
application would be returned for further treatment once submitted.
Applications made at FBU offices:
1. Call/write your local US Embassy or Consulate and make an appointment with FBU for application of a Social Security number.
2. You will receive a letter confirming you appointment and telling you what documents to bring with you.
3. Keep this letter and bring it with you to the appointment as it will
have information as to the person/office dealing with your case.
4. Submit documents (including application form: https://www.ssa.gov/forms/ss-5fs.pdf) and request a contact phone number/email of the person treating your dossier.
5. For applications made at FBU, processing time can vary from several week to several months.
Applications made at Consulate/Embassies without FBU offices:
1. Call/write your local US Embassy or Consulate/and make an appointment to come in to apply for a Social Security number.
2. Request information on what documents are needed to present
3. Present documents (including application form: https://www.ssa.gov/forms/ss-5fs.pdf) to Embassy/Consulate staff and request a contact phone number/email of the person treating your dossier.
4. Applications made at Consulate/Embassies will take longer than those at FBU offices. General Guideline to documents needed to present for application:
For more complete information on Social Security, application forms and information on documentation, please visit: https://www.ssa.gov/foreign/